Deja Vu: multiple definition of `java::lang::String::length()'?

Fri Mar 15 12:20:00 GMT 2002

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

Bryce> Maybe we should consider dropping the gcjh
Bryce> inlining/decompilation altogether. I don't think it is really
Bryce> very useful. It is problematic for binary compatibility, and
Bryce> within libgcj we can just access the fields directly in the
Bryce> cases where it matters.
I'm reluctant to remove it.
I do think that binary compatibility is an important feature for us
moving forward. I'm inclined to go with your proposal on that basis
alone, especially given that there aren't any good counter-arguments :-)
Tom