Deja Vu: multiple definition of `java::lang::String::length()'?

Thu Mar 14 17:26:00 GMT 2002

Adam Megacz wrote:
>Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
>>>gcjh needs a major overhaul. Unfortunately it is very low priority.
>>>>Is there any reason it can't be rewritten in Java?
>
Bootstrapping: ie can't run gcjh without a Java runtime, but can't build 
the runtime without gcjh. Unless we want to assume that there is already 
an existing javac/java or a working gcj, but I'm not sure we're ready to 
make that assumption yet.
Of course, when the front end gets rewritten in Java then there won't be 
a reason why gcjh can't be as well ;-)
regards
Bryce.