[freenet-devl] Re: GCJ runs (a bit) (was: GCJ status 20020305)

Fri Mar 8 06:52:00 GMT 2002

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:00:08PM +1300, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> This is good news. Did you have to make any changes to freenet's code to 
> compile it with GCJ? I quickly (and without hacking any code) tried to 
> build it recently but got stuck because it needed junit, which itself 
> required some javax.swing classes that we don't have (but will soon, 
> hopefully).

I just tried compiling the node itself, no clients.
The node bit doesn't have those dependencies AFAIKS.
> At this point I would reccomend using the GCC 3.1 branch rather than the 
> trunk/mainline. The mainline is a bit unstable right now due to branch 
> landings (right now libjava is not even building on i686 linux).

OK,
I checked and an important recent fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2002-q1/msg00585.html
is in the 3.1 branch so it should work.
regards,
-- 
Göran Thyni
 Luleå / Kiruna, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20020308/9b859d6c/attachment.sig>