printing exceptions?

Tue Mar 5 19:07:00 GMT 2002

On Mar 5, 2002, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> Each link line was about 50K by itself.
> I can send them to you if you really want them.

Ok, I'll pass that. Thanks for doing the grunt work of finding the
differences between the link commands that I had volunteered to do
myself :-)
> Meanwhile I put each line into its own file and turned spaces into
> newlines. Then I diffed the files. Here's the result:

The diffs look perfectly reasonable, except that they indicate you
haven't cleaned <target>/config.cache as recommended after the patch
that removed libstdc++-v3 flags from libjava's CXX went in. But this
shouldn't matter.
The important difference here is that, if you use xgcc but not
-shared-libgcc, the libjava shared library won't be linked with the
shared version of libgcc. It's my understanding that this *should* be
a problem. I don't understand why what you're seeing is the exact
converse, namely, that by omitting -shared-libgcc, you get correct
a working program&shared library, but by leaving it in, things break.
Richard, any suggestions?
-- 
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer