gcj vs classpath merge status
Aaron M. Renn
arenn@urbanophile.com
Tue Jan 29 05:39:00 GMT 2002
Nic Ferrier (nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk) wrote:
> The page showing the merge status of libgcj and classpath shows that
> the classes:
>> java.net.SocketInputStream
> java.net.SocketOutputStream
>> have not been merged into libgcj yet.
>> The main reason for this is that they don't exist in the Sun API.
These are not public classes. They are used internally by the Classpath
implementation.
> Would the Classpath people like me to add timeout code to their Socket
> implementation?
Sure
> If so, would it also be okay to remove the stream classes and make
> them inner classes (of PlainSocketImpl). That should clear them off
> the merge list.
As they aren't public classes, I don't think this is necessary. But
if you really want to, I would not object. (I personally don't care much
for inner classes all that much).
I believe all of the easy parts of java.net are already merged. What
remains is the native stuff, including the corresponding Java classes
and URL's. I think.
--
Aaron M. Renn (arenn@urbanophile.com) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
"We have a choice, either to change the way we live, which is unacceptable,
or to change the way that they live, and we chose the latter."
- Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, News briefing, 2001年09月18日
More information about the Java
mailing list