Speaking of runtime options

Mon Jan 28 15:37:00 GMT 2002

Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
> >Would a new gij (or a new option handler for the gcj tool) be useful? 
> > 
>> Definately! Note that gij could be written in pure Java, unless perhaps 
> there are command line options which can only be set before the runtime 
> is initialized. 

Ok... That's why the gij was in C++ I think. But Hans' comments about
heap settings have shown that dependancy to be spurious.
However, I have a generalized arg parser that is not getopt and is
written in C.
I can quite happily re-write the gij tool with it, and in fact any
other tools.
I'll do a gij and people can take a look.
Nic