libjava failed to build on Linux/x86

Thu Jan 24 18:50:00 GMT 2002

On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:35:43PM +1300, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> >The two are functionally identical, as "+" is expanded to "="/"0".
> >With memories, matching constraints are rarely needed or useful.
>> Strangely, one works while the other does not. The following will fail 
> without -O but works fine with -O:

Hmm. It appears that we do take slightly more care with inout
operands than I previously thought.
> * java/lang/natObject.cc (X86 compare_and_swap): Use +m constraint.

Yes, this is ok.
r~