naming conflicts in libgcj.a

Mon Jan 14 13:39:00 GMT 2002

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> Bryce's idea is to compile each package into a single large .o file.
> This might hurt recompilation times a bit, but it will make other
> things simpler.

So the makefile would have a target for each package, and the build
command for the target would be something like "gcj foo/bar/baz/*.java
-o foo.bar.baz.o"?
Sounds pretty cool.
> I think it makes sense; the only real barrier is a compiler bug
> (there's a PR for it and a hacky fix in the PR).

What's a PR? Problem Report?
 - a