What to do about java.version?

Wed Feb 27 11:50:00 GMT 2002

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> Per> I'd say just use the gcc version - i.e. "3.0.4".

> This came up on java-patches recently. I agree, we should just use
> the gcc version number.

Shouldn't the java.vm.version be the gcc version, while java.version
would be the highest jdk number with which gcj is compatable (at least
1.1, perhaps 1.2)?
 - a
-- 
"If I put copyrighted material into the 'chewy nougat center', I can
 claim the crunchy chocolate coating is an 'Access Control
 Mechanism'." --lynx_user_abroad
Why Windows NT/2k/XP is unreliable: www.zappadoodle.com