[freenet-tech] Technology / Features
Göran Thyni
goran@kirra.net
Tue Feb 26 06:42:00 GMT 2002
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 12:29:57PM -0800, Adam Megacz wrote:
>> Goran Thyni <goran@kirra.net> writes:
> > It is more a question of syntax not handled by gcj at the moment.
>> What syntax does GCJ not handle?
The big one is that it can't inherited from an public inner class.
I filed a bug report PR-5758.
(should have check the DB more closly PR-5632 seems to be the same issue)
There are some smaller issues too,
I will make test cases and file them too.
> I personally don't use GCJ for debugging -- I get my code 100%
> working/debugged/tested under HotSpot, and then recompile with GCJ for
> deployment. VM's and interpreters will probably always provide a
> better debugging environment than static compilers.
Hmm,
of course but freenet works on JDK/Jikes/Kaffe.
When I hack the code to get it to compile with gcj
it doesn't work as good. Neither does a binary compiled
from JDK generated .class files.
Could be my fault,
could be subtle falut in the freenet code,
could be gcj/libgcj bug.
best regards,
--
Göran Thyni
More information about the Java
mailing list