[freenet-tech] Technology / Features
Adam Megacz
gcj@lists.megacz.com
Mon Feb 25 23:45:00 GMT 2002
Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:
> but libgcj is still missing some of the provider/implementation
> gnu.java.security.* classes/packages.
Ah, that would explain why lots of stuff didn't work.
- a
--
"If I put copyrighted material into the 'chewy nougat center', I can
claim the crunchy chocolate coating is an 'Access Control
Mechanism'." --lynx_user_abroad
Why Windows NT/2k/XP is unreliable: www.zappadoodle.com
More information about the Java
mailing list