propose to rename natPlainSocketImpl to natPosixPlainSocketImpl

Sat Feb 2 03:33:00 GMT 2002

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> Another approach would be to define a more complete OS API and then 
> have a single (e.g.) natFile.cc which used the abstract API. I think 
> this would be more work, and perhaps harder to maintain, but I don't 
> have any real objection to it. 
>
And isn't that (broadly) the approach taken by Classpath? For example
they have one networking library which all the JNI calls into.
If we did things the same way they do them then that might make
merging the two easier?
Nic