Linking libgcj, and Java security

Wed Dec 4 19:20:00 GMT 2002

On 4 Dec 2002, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Wed, 2002年12月04日 at 12:10, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Sounds good, if that's indeed the cause of the problem.
>> Hmm.. but then this wouldn't catch pointers to collectable objects found
> in C/C++ data/bss.

Not unless they are linked via gcj, as any CNI code should be.
I'm not too thrilled with the idea though... do you think it's better or
worse than reading /proc/self/maps? Neither seems really portable.
Jeff