who's been mucking with EXEEXT?

Tue Aug 27 21:38:00 GMT 2002

Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com> writes:
> The 2nd definition applies to non-canadian crosses.

>From the name, that would seem to be the case. However, in real life,
a non-canadian cross is using the canadian definition. Any idea why
this is?
> Anyway, am I incorrect saying that gcjh is a host utility but EXEEXT
> is a target setting?

You are correct.
> And even for win32 hosts, $(EXEEXT) need not be present in this
> macro to find gcjh?

I believe that htis is incorrect.
On cygwin, I think you can omit .exe, but on mingw ("real windows")
you definately cannot. However, the gcc in CVS can't be built to run
on a mingw host (there's a giganto-patch for 2.96 out there), so this
is probably a non-issue.
> 2002年08月27日 Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>
>> 	* Makefile.am (ZIP, GCJH): Remove $(EXEEXT).

This works; can you please check it in?
 - a
-- 
"Cassette tapes are killing the music industry" -- RIAA spokesperson, 1978