gcc-3.1 2002年04月03日 libjava failures on sparc-linux?

Wed Apr 17 10:54:00 GMT 2002

On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:46:38AM -0700, Boehm, Hans wrote:
> I think this part of the patch should be checked into both the branch and
> trunk. If in parallel someone else could try this on other Linux/SPARC
> machines, that would help to verify that the main stack base is always
> correctly reported in /proc. But the current code is very hard to defend,
> at least given the fact that it isn't always correct.
>> If you would like me to check it in, please let me know.

pleas go ahead and do so, I'll restart a test build whenever your patch is
in.
> I will hold off on the proposed/conjectured Solaris/64 patch since nobody
> has been able to test that.

That's a good point. I would urge anyone with such an arch to test your
suggested patch. Do you think you could check the sparc32 patch in, branch
and trunk, and then post a suggested patch of the sparc64 remains to
gcc-patches so we will be able to reference it to anyone able to test it?
Cheers,
/ChJ
BTW, thanks for your efforts in sorting this out, easy solved but a long
way :-)