Patch: FYI: gcj3.1 status update

Mon Apr 8 13:18:00 GMT 2002

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> Better though to fix System.gc() so that it doesn't return
Andrew> until a grabage collection cycle has really happned. There
Andrew> are deadlock problems with this, as I mentioned before. I
Andrew> guess we could work around that problem with a fairly short
Andrew> timeout.
Could you submit a PR for this, so we can track it in the future? I
agree that these things (System.gc and .runFinalization) should be
synchronous.
I'm not too concerned about these for 3.1. I see the "GC on open()
failure" thing as more a whim of mine than a real requirement.
Tom