Could you please check this into 3.0.1, too?

Tue Sep 18 20:35:00 GMT 2001

Jeff Sturm wrote:
>These are reasonable suggestions. But it's really not up to me to decide
>what does/does not go in 3.0.2. Would anyone object to committing these?
>I have no objection. Any fixes that don't touch huge amounts of code and 
arn't likely to cause more new bugs than they fix should be considered 
for 3.0.x if the bug is annoying enough.
The main thing we should be careful about is breaking compatibility: 
code compiled against 3.0 should continue to work against 3.0.x.
Maybe it would be nice if we had a volunteer who would keep track of 
candidate patches to go into 3.0.x?
regards
Bryce.