Dan Walter wrote: >Because of the high integration between the java.lang package and the Java >VM, I think it may be better if the GNU Classpath did not contain a >java.lang package and assumed anyone implementing a Java VM would create >their own. > It already does. See http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/doc/vmintegration.html For historical and CNI reasons we don't clearly separate the VM interface in libgcj. regards Bryce.