`asm' in natObject.cc

Fri Nov 9 18:17:00 GMT 2001

On my x86 box I'm seeing a libgcj build failure:
 In file included from ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:281:
 ../../../gcc/boehm-gc/include/gc.h:53:1: warning: "GC_LINUX_THREADS" redefined
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:1:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc: In function `void 
 heavy_lock_obj_finalization_proc(void*, void*)':
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc: In function `void 
 _Jv_MonitorEnter(java::lang::Object*)':
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc: In function `void 
 _Jv_MonitorExit(java::lang::Object*)':
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc: In member function `void 
 java::lang::Object::wait(__java_long, __java_int)':
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc: In member function `void 
 java::lang::Object::notify()':
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc: In member function `void 
 java::lang::Object::notifyAll()':
 ../../../gcc/libjava/java/lang/natObject.cc:329: inconsistent operand 
 constraints in an `asm'
Is anybody else seeing this?
I know nothing about inline asm. Are these errors valid?
Tom