Patch for an off by one error in _Jv_FindIIndex

Wed May 16 06:37:00 GMT 2001

On Wednesday, May 16, 2001, at 08:14 PM, Martin Kahlert wrote:
> The subject says it all.
> ioffsets[0] contains the length of ioffsets (including itself).
> Thus its last accessible entry is at index position ioffsets[0]-1
> (found by Electric Fence and a hello world example)

Cool, thanks for finding these. Clearly nobody has run libgcj with 
electric fence before!
> PS: Is there anybody besides Tom (how seems to be busy with other items 
> these
> days), who can commit such simple bugfixes?
> I have two other patches pending
> (cf. Threads 'Library problem in jni.cc on Linux'
> and 'Is this bugfix correct (jni.cc)?')

I will commit bug fixes for most parts of libgcj when I have time 
(usually when I'm bored at work ;-). These patches in particular are to 
my code so I'll take a good look at this tomorrow and commit. The JNI 
patches however I have left to Tom since I'm not very familiar with 
either JNI or our (Toms) implementation of it.
regards
 [ bryce ]