Java test failures

Thu May 3 16:47:00 GMT 2001

>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

 Tom> I agree, and we've already decided on and implemented a
 Tom> policy of 0 FAIL for libgcj. We also work to reduce the
 Tom> XPASS count as much as possible (sometimes it isn't easily
 Tom> doable to make the XPASS count always be 0). The nicest
 Tom> thing about 0 FAIL is that you immediately know if something
 Tom> has gone wrong.
Great; we're totally on the same page. 
I look forward to the patch.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com