Possible patch for miscompiled defer-pops

Tue May 1 12:59:00 GMT 2001

On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:29:25AM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> However, I have no idea if this actually *is* the correct fix,
> since I do not know the protocol for dealing with deferred
> pops in the middle-end.

It is the correct action, however:
> emit_label (label_rtx (LABELED_BLOCK_LABEL (exp)));

I'm pretty sure that this should be
 expand_label (LABELED_BLOCK_LABEL (exp));
which will also take care of the do_pending_stack_adjust.
The only caveat would be the stack_block_stack machinations,
which I don't really understand...
r~