libgcj/1736

Thu Mar 8 19:43:00 GMT 2001

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2001, Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
>> > Perhaps it would suffice to simply clear "wl" when entering the
> > incremental mode, assuming we know the linker will always be called
> > directly when doing incremental.
>> Yep. Please try this patch.

The patch doesn't work. I think thats because at this point, $libobjs has already been evaluated taking into
account the $wl value (around about line 3068).
regards
 [ bryce ]