gcj performance on Solaris 2.6

Jeff Sturm jsturm@one-point.com
Mon Jul 30 21:07:00 GMT 2001

• Previous message (by thread): gcj performance on Solaris 2.6
• Next message (by thread): gcj performance on Solaris 2.6
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On 26 Jul 2001, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I do think we at least need to have -fkeep-inline-functions be the
> default. A separate issue, I guess.

How would you suggest I get this into the specs? I'm still weak on that
part of the compiler.
Jeff

---

• Previous message (by thread): gcj performance on Solaris 2.6
• Next message (by thread): gcj performance on Solaris 2.6
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Java mailing list