Applications

Thu Jul 12 21:44:00 GMT 2001

Jeff Sturm writes:
> Eventually it'll be a nice regression test, probably for 3.1, as it
> will not work on 3.0.1 (though it does compile with 3.0).

Maybe I should have a look at it. I also thought that Jython would be
a nice regression test -- I would guess there are a lot of Python
torture tests. Note I'm already running some Kawa tests.
We're pretty close to compiling Jython. We're missing RMI and some
other misc. packages (like the one that contains JavaLoaderFactory.)
BTW, I'm revising my patch, still being tested.
./A
2001年07月12日 Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@redhat.com>
	* parse.y (patch_method_invocation): Don't override the primary if
	one is already provided, but let this$<n> be built.
Index: parse.y
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/java/parse.y,v
retrieving revision 1.295
diff -u -p -r1.295 parse.y

--- parse.y	2001年07月12日 21:36:43	1.295
+++ parse.y	2001年07月13日 04:35:53
@@ -10030,7 +10036,7 @@ patch_method_invocation (patch, primary,
 	 - LIST is non static. It's invocation is transformed from
 	 x(a1,....,an) into access$<n>(this$<n>,a1,...,an).
 	 - LIST is static. It's invocation is transformed from
-	 x(a1,....,an) into TYPEOF(this$<n>).x(a1,....an).
+	 x(a1,....,an) into TYPE_OF(this$<n>).x(a1,....an).
 
 	 Of course, this$<n> can be abitrary complex, ranging from
 	 this0ドル (the immediate outer context) to 
@@ -10040,7 +10046,8 @@ patch_method_invocation (patch, primary,
 	 this_arg has to be moved into the (then generated) stub
 	 argument list. In the meantime, the selected function
 	 might have be replaced by a generated stub. */
-	 if (maybe_use_access_method (is_super_init, &list, &this_arg))
+	 if (!primary &&
+	 maybe_use_access_method (is_super_init, &list, &this_arg))
 	 {
 	 args = tree_cons (NULL_TREE, this_arg, args);
 	 this_arg = NULL_TREE; /* So it doesn't get chained twice */
