Don't optimize by hand (Was Re: Lack of fabsf on Solaris(patch included))

Fri Jan 26 21:19:00 GMT 2001

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Not necessarily: non-strict FP can be exactly the same as strict FP at
> the implementor's discretion. In this case the question is, are the
> values GCJ returns incorrect?

My understanding is that the values GCJ returns are incorrect according to
the spec's definition of strictfp. However, they are not incorrect
relative to most other x86 implementations of Java.
regards
 [ bryce ]