[PATCH] Don't set function's DECL_NAME to an EXPR_WFL

Sun Jan 21 21:17:00 GMT 2001

Bryce McKinlay <bryce@albatross.co.nz> writes:
> It is my understanding that removing that code may cause GCJ to ICE on
> certain illegal code where it would otherwise have reported a reasonable
> error. If that's the case, it should definitely remain in at least until
> after the branch.

The problem is that leaving the code in can also produce a compiler
crash on certain illegal code, judging from my (vaguely remembered)
experience, if the FUNCTION_DECL in question ever gets passed to code
in the back-end.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/~per/