Java web pages

Thu Jan 18 16:25:00 GMT 2001

Per Bothner wrote:
> What is the list about?
> (1) Java in general,
> (2) GNU Java in general,
> (3) free/open-source Java in general, or
> (4) specifically about gcj, libgcj and issues related to their
> use and implementation.
>> So perhaps "gcj-discuss" or just "gcj" would be better.
> Perhaps "java@gcc.gnu.org" implies that but I think a
> more specific name might be better.

java@gcc.gnu.org is definitely my favorite, but I'd accept gcj@gcc.gnu.org
as a compromise. The list is really about gcj but in practice (2) and (3)
are often relevant topics, and "java@" just looks better.
Both of these are better than "java-discuss", since the "-discuss" part is
redundant and does imply the wrong thing.
regards
 [ bryce ]