Branching for GCC 3.0

Wed Jan 10 14:02:00 GMT 2001

Tom Tromey wrote:
> Joseph> * Will the old libstdc++ still be included in 3.0 (in
> Joseph> which case references to EGCS in it should be cleaned up,
> Joseph> etc.)?
>> Mark> No. As soon as GCJ doesn't need it, we will remove V2 from the
> Mark> source tree. At least I think that's what we agreed upon the
> Mark> last time this went around.
>> Guys, do we still need libstdc++ V2?
> My current build is done with --enable-libstdcxx-v3.
> I haven't tried deleting v2 to see if that works though.

No. libgcj requires libstdc++-v3. It does not work with the old
libstdc++ because it needs to find libsupc++. However, v3 has been the
default for some time so I believe the "--enable-libstdc++-v3" is no
longer required.
regards
 [ bryce ]