[patch] java run-time stack trace

Wed Feb 7 20:14:00 GMT 2001

>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

Per> This patch accomplishes that. It does have the undesirable
Per> side-effect that C or C++ functions are are written Java-style
Per> (i.e no * or ::):
Per> but I think that is reasonable enough for a Java stack printer.
I agree.
Per> Any objections to checking this in (now, before the branch)?
I think it is fine: it is low risk, correct, useful, etc.
c++filt is part of gcc so I don't think there is any danger with
version skew.
Per> I believe glibc includes a demangler. It would be better to use
Per> that when available but that requires some configury magic.
Could you add a PR for this?
Tom