safety of GCJ-generated code
Per Bothner
per@bothner.com
Mon Dec 17 10:19:00 GMT 2001
Adam Megacz wrote:
> Is GCJ-compiled code "safe" in the sense that no malicious input to a
> program can possibly cause it to crash or jump to memory locations
> that aren't part of its code? (ie buffer overflows, stack-busting). By
> crash, I mean something beyond an uncaught exception.
I believe so. However, there are a couple areas where the
verifier is known to be incomplete: Verifying of interface
calls, and that constructors are called on newly-allocated
objects. (There may be others.)
--
--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/per/
More information about the Java
mailing list