should UINT32 be a macro or typedef?
Adam Megacz
gcj@lists.megacz.com
Mon Dec 10 11:57:00 GMT 2001
Somewhere in the headers pulled in by libjava/boehm.cc, one header
wants UINT32 to be a #define, and another wants it to be a typedef. I
haven't figured out exactly where the conflict is, but when I find it,
which one is "right"?
Right now I just hacked it by #undef UINT32 in boehm.cc, but I'd like
to come up with a cleaner solution before I submit my patch.
- a
More information about the Java
mailing list