native static inner class methods?

Tue Dec 4 16:50:00 GMT 2001

Adam Megacz wrote:
>>Its because gcj and g++ disagree on how the "$" symbol should be 
>>mangled. IIRC, the C++ guys agreed that it should do what gcj does 
>>(mangle it to a unicode symbol), but they never implemented it.
>>>>Hrm, is this a lot of work for them? If not, I'm thinking of hopping
>on to the g++ list and groveling until somebody implements it. If I
>do this, do you mind if I quote your post?
>
Sure, it would be good to get this resolved. See also this old thread on 
the subject:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-03/msg01667.html
regards
Bryce.