gcc@gnu.org doesn't like me

Tue Dec 4 14:51:00 GMT 2001

Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
> Mark has said in the past that the release schedule/rules do not 
> necessarily apply to gcj/libgcj - its up to us to use our discretion 
> about what java changes go in during the stabilization period (asssuming 
> they do not affect other parts of the compiler, of course). My feeling 
> is that 2 months is longer than we need for stabilization work in gcj, 
> and my vote is to continue to accept most changes/enhancements/ports 
> during this period.

Sweet =)
All in all, I'll only be missing the deadline by 10 days.
 - a