`asm' in natObject.cc
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Sun Dec 2 12:44:00 GMT 2001
Bryce> I'm guessing that its a libgcj bug, but a g++ bug that it
Bryce> doesn't get reported at -O2. I'm no "asm" expert, but this
Bryce> fixed it for me:
Thanks.
Bryce> Oops - the behaviour of "-MD -MF" must be slightly different
Bryce> between gcj and g++ because gcj doesn't delete the deps file
Bryce> when compilation fails. I checked in the patch below which
Bryce> should take care of it.
Yeah. Unfortunately I failed to track the -M* rewrite closely enough
and a less-than-optimal (for automake) change went in to gcc and g++.
The code for gcj was written first and so didn't have the problem.
Converting gcj to use the generic dependency tracking infrastructure
has been on my to-do list for a long time, but it has never seemed
very important.
Tom
More information about the Java
mailing list