ia64 libjava java-signal.h build failure

Thu Apr 19 12:07:00 GMT 2001

On Apr 19, 2001, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> Why is Java not built by default on the branch?
> Does anyone know?

I guess it was disabled in the past just because it wasn't stable
enough and was hampering the testing of the rest of the development
snapshot. I'm all for re-enabling it by default.
> Is it hard to enable it by default for known good platforms?

Nope. Just comment out the `build_by_default=no' line in
gcc/java/config-lang.in, and it should build by default. The
top-level configure.in already disables libgcj on a number of
platforms, so that should be enough.
-- 
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me