dynamic library cost (was RE: libtool, java woes)

Tue Apr 10 13:22:00 GMT 2001

On Apr 10, 2001, "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm@hp.com> wrote:
>> From: Alexandre Oliva [ mailto:aoliva@redhat.com ]

>> We either need libsupc++ to be a shared library, that both libstdc++
>> and libgcj depend on, or have libgcj depend on libstdc++.

> I'm seeing significant overheads as a result of dynamic library
> calls.

In this particular case, it would make no difference at all: libsupc++
is already compiled as PIC, even though it's a static library.
-- 
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me