Oskar Liljeblad wrote: > What happened with the idea to add a field class$ (to simulate > the java construct XXX.class) in gcjh generated header files? > Wouldn't it just be a matter of modifying gcj to generate > something like this: Oskar, take a look at Tom's weekend patches: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/java-patches/2000-q3/msg00175.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-09/msg00085.html Hopefully these will be committed to the trunk sometime this week. -Jeff