libgcj.so vs. libgcjawt.so

Sat May 20 10:11:00 GMT 2000

Bryce> With the java.beans stuff in, libgcj.so now depends on
Bryce> libgcjawt.so, which pretty much makes having them in separate
Bryce> .so's pointless.
I agree.
Bryce> I think we should stick everything into libgcj.so, and reserve
Bryce> libgcjawt.so for peers (Note that java/awt has no static
Bryce> dependency on the peers, they get loaded dynamically with
Bryce> forName()).
Sounds good. I'll do it soon if nobody beats me to it.
Tom