JvSynchronize nitpick

Paul Fisher pnfisher@redhat.com
Mon Mar 27 18:24:00 GMT 2000

• Previous message (by thread): PR libgcj/184 [was Re: Re: Some null pointer method invocations causes segmentation fault]
• Next message (by thread): JvSynchronize nitpick
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

For JvSynchronize, why not make `synchronized' a macro (or slightly
name mangled) that expands into the current JvSynchronize syntax?
So C++ code would look like:
{ synchronized (OBJ); CODE; }
which is more in line with the Java syntax.

---

• Previous message (by thread): PR libgcj/184 [was Re: Re: Some null pointer method invocations causes segmentation fault]
• Next message (by thread): JvSynchronize nitpick
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Java mailing list