where should the .o files end up?

Tue Jul 18 10:00:00 GMT 2000

Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Mo> Would it be possible to get the -d option to do the same
> Mo> thing as this -o option? That would be a lot easier for
> Mo> most Java developers as it would match what javac does.
>> You mean using -d when compiling to object? I don't know if that is
> possible or not. If it is it is probably ugly to do.

Right, -d has no effect on object files, and probably shouldn't, to
remain compatible with other GNU compilers.
For compatibility with JDK, I recommend a shell script... you can even
call it `javac'. If I can still find the one I used, I'll post it to
the list.
> When compiling to .class files gcj already acts like javac.

Except for dependent classes, yes.
--
Jeff Sturm
jeff.sturm@appnet.com