JVM Usenix paper got rejected

Sun Dec 17 16:39:00 GMT 2000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Sturm <jeff.sturm@appnet.com> writes:
> Nic Ferrier wrote:
> > I think that GCJ is a really usefull weapon in the armoury. It may
> > even become a standard way of improving Java performance but my own
> > view is it's likely to remain just another option.
>> However gcj is unique in several ways.
><snip>
Here is another... integration with the Operating System and X... it would be
nice if Java developers could write applications and have them become standard
portions of the OS... maybe not the kernel but certainly additional commands and
maybe part of GNOME/KDE.
> Myself, I tire quickly of language wars. We use Java because it's
> reasonably fast, safe, extensible and well-supported. But the real
> innovation seems to have drained out of Java nowadays, and I find myself
> keeping one eye open for something better.

yeah... hopefully something better will be GCJ.
Kevin
- -- 
Kevin A. Burton ( burton@apache.org, burton@openprivacy.org, burtonator@acm.org )
 Cell: 408-910-6145 URL: http://relativity.yi.org ICQ: 73488596 
They have the guns, money, and press but we have the technology!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Get my public key at: http://relativity.yi.org/pgpkey.txt
iD8DBQE6PVvMAwM6xb2dfE0RArByAKDSkuewpEHDyYis6XX1sRdgX5AdCwCeNECr
waU3g8f/KfOllxLiuaILN7w=
=PIf5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
North Korea SDI radar [Hello to all my fans in domestic surveillance] Uzi
ammunition Rule Psix bomb class struggle Albanian Serbian Treasury security
Panama Ft. Meade