release possibility

Sat Apr 1 00:00:00 GMT 2000

Tom Tromey wrote:
> Meanwhile, the idea of making the current gcj plug into the 2.95.2
> release seems good. It lets us easily transition into the above plan
> if 2.95.3 becomes a reality. Unfortunately, I don't have any time to
> work on this.

Sounds good.
I got 2.95.2 working with the current cvs libgcj last night. Theres a few more
patches I'd like to add, and once I've found some time to do that and test it a
bit I'll post the patch.
Back-end -O bugs in the current cvs are annoying.
regards
 [ bryce ]