Implementation Q

Sat Apr 1 00:00:00 GMT 2000

> Anyway, yes, not supporting rtti makes it hard to link gcj code to
> existing C++ libraries which rely on rtti. Fixing gcj is the best
> approach. If you need it in a timely way, as always, you'll probably
> have to write it yourself...

Yep. I suspect that a partial solution would be easy enough, ie lie :)
One could, I suppose, make typeinfo for a Java class be the same as that for 
void, or create some other opaque thing - JavaClass or something.
How does that strike you, as an initial approximation?
Colin.