gcj -D
Mike Moreton
mike@pillim.demon.co.uk
Tue Oct 19 13:10:00 GMT 1999
Tom said:
> That might be true, but it is just speculation.
True!
> Another way to solve your problem is to have the linker omit code that
> is not used. When you build the production version of your
> application, you would link with a special flag to do this. The GNU
> binutils have support for this, but gcj doesn't take advantage of it
> yet.
This is something I'd like to know more about. Can you give me any pointers
to where to look?
Mike.
More information about the Java
mailing list