question about arithmetic exceptions

Alexandre Oliva oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br
Mon Nov 29 09:51:00 GMT 1999


On Nov 29, 1999, Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> On Nov 29, 1999, Andrew Haley <aph@pasanda.cygnus.co.uk> wrote:

>> > Sure, that would work. No disagreement. But does the problem justify
>> > such a large reorganization of the compiler?

>> This reorganization is long due. It's probably planned as part of the
>> major rework of gcc building infrastructure. Just don't tell Godmar
>> I'm willing to try to introduce automake and libtool in that process
>> :-) :-)

> If this will add such "break-through" features as the ability to
> add linker scripts to libtool (or is it automake?), I'm all for it.
> ;-)

Absolutely. But the introduction of libtool would allow for the
separate compilation of front-ends, and linking with a back-end shared
library. And automake would give us at least automatic dependency
tracking. But there's a long way to go before this becomes true.
-- 
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva IC-Unicamp, Bra[sz]il
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br,guarana.{org,com}} aoliva@{acm,computer}.org
oliva@{gnu.org,kaffe.org,{egcs,sourceware}.cygnus.com,samba.org}
** I may forward mail about projects to mailing lists; please use them


More information about the Java mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /