Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com> writes: > We don't link it in. libstdc++ got in trouble here since parts of > libiberty are GPLd; maybe we should just avoid it. I believe the "missing functions" (such as memmove) are public domain or otherwise non-problematical. We might want to be a little careful, but I think libgcj should follow whatever solution libstdc++ uses. -- --Per Bothner bothner@pacbell.net per@bothner.com http://home.pacbell.net/bothner/