Patches for faster interface dispatch, type checking

Fri Dec 10 12:01:00 GMT 1999

 How about this: once the stuff is checked in, or I'll get a chance to apply it 
to my tree, I'll simply send a test case that bombs. For time reasons,
I'm afraid this won't happen in this millenium, though.
	- Godmar
>> Godmar Back <gback@cs.utah.edu> writes:
>> > Not being able to handle java.lang.Object is maybe not top-critical,
> > but it's important in that it currently prevents gcj from executing valid
> > bytecode other JVMs do execute. (I.e., bytecode you may find in a binary
> > distribution of a software package.)
>> I'm guessing this is tied in with previous discussins, but I think
> it would help if you explained again what is needed to "handle Object".
> -- 
> 	--Per Bothner
> per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/~per/
>