egcs_update script, should touch java files?

Thu Sep 17 00:16:00 GMT 1998

 In message <199809162149.RAA19915@caip.rutgers.edu>you write:
 > 	Okay, I've checked in patches for egcs_update and faq.html
 > adding to them gcc/java/parse.[ch]. 
Thanks.
 > However I noticed there is a circular dependency between
 > gcc/java/parse.[ch]. Here is the output from make:
 > 
 > > make[3]: Circular parse.h <- parse.c dependency dropped.
 > 
 > 	This may cause make to try to rebuild them with bison anyway, if
 > the dropped dependency is opposite from the order the two files are
 > touched. (Was that worded clearly?)
 > 
 > 	I'm not sure which dependency should go.
Yea. I'd noticed, but hadn't actually looked at it.
Looking at it now, I think having PARSE_C depend on PARSE_H, lex.c
and lex.h is probably wrong. parse.c is built simply from parse.y.
But maybe there's something I'm missing.
I've cc'd the java discussion group to get their opinions.
jeff