hello?

Fri Oct 9 16:37:00 GMT 1998

Per Bothner wrote:
> GCJ is not based on Kaffe. Some Kaffe-isms (such as field names)
> may still exist, but consider them historical artifacts.

And the fact that the internal structures generated by GCJ are almost
identical to those used by Kaffe, especially the old 0.9.x release, is a mear
coincidence? Even the field ordering is the same, the layout of the constant
pool, the numbering of the states a class goes through while initialising.
the method structure ... would you like me to go on ...? I even think it's
bug compatible in places :)
Regards
Tim
--
 Tim Wilkinson Tel: +1 510 704 1660
 Transvirtual Technologies, Inc., Fax: +1 510 704 1893
 Berkeley, CA, USA. Email: tim@transvirtual.com